Slay the Spire 2 dev’s thoughts on being review bombed 💣 #slaythespire2 #slaythespire #steam...
Slay the Spire 2 dev's thoughts on being review bombed 💣
#slaythespire2 #slaythespire #steam #pcgaming #pcgamer
https://www.pcgamer.com
X: https://x.com/pcgamer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@pcgamer_mag Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pcgamer_mag/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pcgamermagazine/ Forum: https://forums.pcgamer.com/
To subscribe to the magazine in the US, UK, or elsewhere, visit magazines direct.
PC Gamer is the global authority on PC games. For over 30 years, we’ve been at the forefront of covering PC gaming with worldwide print editions, around-the-clock news, features, esports coverage, hardware testing, and game reviews, as well as our popular PC Gaming Shows.
The release of Slay the Spire 2 has sparked a broad spectrum of reactions from the community. As a developer deeply embedded in the project, I’ve spent countless hours listening to players, analyzing data, and weighing design decisions that shape the experience. One phenomenon that has become impossible to ignore is review bombing: a surge of low ratings and polarized feedback aimed not just at the game, but at the team, the direction of the sequel, and the expectations built around a beloved franchise.
First, it’s essential to acknowledge the root causes. Slay the Spire set a high bar with its original blend of deck-building, roguelike progression, and strategic depth. Fans formed strong attachments to the systems, art style, and pacing that defined the first game. When Slay the Spire 2 arrived with notable shifts—whether in combat tempo, card economy, progression curves, or narrative framing—it's natural for some players to feel a sense of loss, misalignment, or even disappointment. Review bombing is often less about the current product alone and more about what the product represented for people—the memory of a favorite game, the anticipation surrounding a long-awaited sequel, and a belief that certain design principles should endure.
From the development side, the feedback landscape feels like a constant dialogue. We monitor sentiment across forums, social channels, and internal playtesting notes to understand where players connect or disconnect. When a core mechanic or progression idea doesn’t land, we don’t shy away from that data. Instead, we use it to iterate, communicate more transparently, and recalibrate where appropriate. Transparency is crucial. If a feature is changing the game in ways that ripple through the player’s long-term strategy or run diversity, we owe the community a clear explanation of the intent, the trade-offs, and the path forward.
One of the biggest challenges in this space is balancing artistic and design intent with broad accessibility. The original Slay the Spire succeeded by offering deep strategic possibilities that rewarded experimentation and mastery. In Slay the Spire 2, we aimed to expand those possibilities while introducing new systems that could enrich replayability. Some players embraced the new rhythm, while others preferred the familiar tempo of the first game. Both responses are valid and valuable as feedback. Our approach has been to identify the common threads in both praise and critique and to determine which aspects warrant preservation, which require refinement, and where bold experimentation should continue.
In the face of criticism, constructive engagement matters most. We actively solicit constructive feedback—detailed observations about balance, progression pacing, card interaction, and the learning curve. Vague statements about “it doesn’t feel right” are less actionable than notes that pinpoint where a card interaction underwhelms, where late-game scaling stalls, or where a mentor-like NPC’s guidance feels intrusive or insufficient. The goal is not merely to defend the design but to understand how changes translate into player experience, moment-to-moment decisions, and long-term satisfaction.
Community feedback can also highlight blind spots that aren’t obvious from internal testing. For instance, a hint of fatigue in late runs, or a perception that certain cards overpower others in ways that reduce diversity, can emerge only after thousands of playthroughs. When such signals appear, we re-evaluate the card pool, counterplay options, and resource management tempo to preserve the freshness of repeated playthroughs while maintaining meaningful choice.
Regarding review bombing specifically, it’s important to separate the emotional reactions from actionable insight. The emotional response—frustration, nostalgia, excitement, relief—drives engagement and conversation. The actionable piece lies in concrete, specific feedback that helps us adjust balance, clarity, and systems design without erasing the identity of the game. We commit to listening generously while upholding a consistent development timeline and craft philosophy.
As we move forward, our priorities include:
- Clarity and transparency: sharing design goals, upcoming changes, and why certain decisions were made. - Responsiveness: addressing the most impactful issues with timely patches or documented roadmaps. - Depth and accessibility: refining systems to reward mastery while lowering unnecessary friction for new players. - Community collaboration: continuing conversations with players, modders, and content creators who explore the game in diverse ways.
Ultimately, the journey of Slay the Spire 2 is ongoing. The conversation with the community doesn’t end with a patch note or a press release; it evolves with each new run, each shared strategy, and each thoughtful critique. We remain committed to delivering a game that respects the original spirit while offering fresh, compelling challenges for both returning fans and newcomers. If you’ve shared feedback, thank you for contributing to a product that grows because of your input. The best outcomes arise when passion for the game meets a balanced, collaborative approach to design.
In closing, the experience of review reaction—whether celebratory, critical, or mixed—reflects a deeply invested player base. That investment is exactly what makes the Slay the Spire community distinctive. As developers, we aim to honor that passion by listening carefully, iterating thoughtfully, and communicating openly about where we’re headed next. The result, we hope, is a game that not only stands on its own merits but also earns the continued trust and enthusiasm of the players who brought it to life through their time, patience, and thoughtful critique.
All the best video games, all the time. Watch no commentary gaming videos live and on demand. By Adrian M ThePRO the Game Professional.
• You are a pro gamer! • Share your content! • Get discovered!
Join The Pro Gamers Community on social media or login to 24/7 Video Game and submit your posts right to this website.
New & used video games, consoles, handhelds, retro, and gaming merchandise. Up Game Shop has the latest and greatest video game deals on the internet.
